Bursa has something to offer too!

The last two years have seen many non-US investors/traders attracted to US equity and bond market for various reasons eg strong US dollar, high interest rate, poor local market performance (those I am aware of - HKEX, Bursa), super performance of superstar Tech giants - especially the magnificent 7 (Apple, Microsoft, Tesla, Nvidia, Google, Amazon, Meta), resulting in more fund flow to US, more so when international funds trying to avoid HK/China market has also either go to US or Japan. 

 Of course, there are always contrarian investors who find HK/China market at very attractive valuation now, which we will only know in future whether this action will bring superb return in the next few years. As the saying goes, high can get higher and low can get lower, there are times this is right and there are times, it can be big mistake by hoping so in investing decision. 

Since stock investment over the last two years getting more complicated with the 3 highs - high interest rate, high inflation and high volatility, I tend to focus on risk first - diversification through ETF & different market, prudent capital allocation that minimize losses in the event of picking the bad company, try to select companies with healthy financial position and expected to be still profitable if there is recession (which many are expecting it will come soon). That lead me to look at Bursa which I have underweight for quite a while. 

There are these 3 sectors - plantation, glove and furniture - which I find could offer some bargain at this moment, better still if there is more negative news flow to make them bigger bargain. Covid pandemic has actually strengthen the financial position of some of the companies in these sectors and currently they are facing with various issues ( over capacity in glove, commodity price has come down for plantation, lower demand for furniture in US as interest rates has affected consumers' discretionary spending). 

Plantation and furniture appears cyclical in nature, so invest during down cycle should work, the uncertainty is when the cycle will turn. These are the few names that may be worth studying - Kossan, TaAnn, Jaya Tiasa, SOP, Lii Hen.

ETF with Covered Call ideal for stable income seekers??

The ETF products have evolved so much that almost any theme, sector, value/growth, dividend etc that you can think of are available in the US market, so much so that one is spoilt for choice.

One of the dilemma in selecting which ETF is better also depend on the objective as well as risk and return tolerance of investors. Often, there is trade off between these ETFs.  

For purpose of illustrating one of the trade off , I have used the following 4 ETFs :-

QQQ (PURPLE line in chart) - Invesco QQQ is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Index includes the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq based on market cap. Current dividend yield is 0.51%, distributed quarterly.

SPY (BLACK line in chart) - is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P 500 Index, which consists of the 500 largest companies on US market. Current dividend yield is 1.3%, distributed quarterly.

XYLD (RED line in chart) - The Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) follows a “covered call” or “buy-write” strategy, in which the Fund buys the stocks in the S&P 500 Index and “writes” or “sells” corresponding call options on the same index. Current dividend yield is around 12%, distributed monthly.

QYLD (GREEN line in chart) -The Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) follows a “covered call” or “buy-write” strategy, in which the Fund buys the stocks in the Nasdaq 100 Index and “writes” or “sells” corresponding call options on the same index. Current dividend yield is around 14%, distributed monthly.

Please do note that foreign individual is subject to 30% withholding tax on US dividend. 

The chart above does not take into consideration of dividend paid as it is the price of each ETF. Just to give some comparison in terms of return (ex-dividend) basis from Jun 2013 to Apr 2022 (almost 9 years). Numbers below are quick estimates from website without verifying the actual dividend paid over the last 9 years:-

Cummulative price appreciation (dividend pay out not factored in):-

QQQ   +386% (annual dividend around 0.3%)

SPY    +177% (annual dividend around 1.2%)

XYLD   +22% (annual dividend from 8 - 10%) 

QYLD   -13% ( annual dividend from 9 - 12%)

The last 2 years has seen drastic growth in Tech sector, especially after the covid pandemic, hence QQQ's return has been remarkable in the last 2 years while SPY also consists of many giant tech companies also recorded impressive return. In comparison, ETFs with covered call strategy(XYLD & QYLD) while providing good and steady dividend income about 10% p.a, did not show good capital gain as they sell covered call and lost the upside potential when price keep going up and Call being trigerred. Hence, even with the high dividend* included, ETFs with covered call strategy will still fall behind on total return in the growing market, especially if the growth is fast and significant.

We can see during 2014 to 2018 when the growth was not that significant, the total return gap between straight forward ETFs and Covered Call ETFs are not that big and I would say during the down market, Covered Call ETFs would probably provide the cushion with Covered Call strategy to continue with good dividend income though the price will fall just as the normal ETFs.

Hence, if we seek stable income eg retirees who need monthly cash flow,  and willing to trade off with potentially high capital return, ETFs with covered call strategy may not be a bad option. There is always an ETF that fit into one's objective but no ETF can meet all needs (capital gain, dividend, steady, monthly, etc).   

 

 * Non US resident is subject to 30% withholding tax on dividend.

Always keep an open mind

 

After investing for the last 30 years, only the last 2 years have prompted me to keep an open mind about investment - thanks partly to Covid which has changed people's life, economy and many more aspects.

Though I have invested in Bursa, HKEX & SGX for many years but was dragging my feet to explore US market, partly because of the time zone that caused the concern if anything major happened in US stock market while I am sleeping, I could not re-act fast enough. I always felt more comfortable with companies that I think I understand more because they are closer to Malaysia :(). In addition, I always imagine with so many derivative products on US market and so many hedge fund in the market to slaughter small retailers, the risk is so much higher. After all, I heard some very successful investors in Malaysia only invest in Bursa !!

What happened the last 2 years ( especially after the departure of both my parent in 2020) has prompted me to think more openly and continue with my passion in investing - to earn and also to learn more about financial products. That is my passion.

The 1st thing that came to my mind, comparing all the stock markets' historical  performance, US stock market has the most impressive long term return for whatever reason (whether QE, or almost all the world's Top 500 companies are there etc). So I asked myself, is it easier to invest in good companies in a market that has shown long term growth or try to find a few hidden gems in a market that has not been growing?? If I have very good insights and industry knowledge in a particular slow or no growth market eg Bursa , yes, I should focus there because I believe I could find the shining star easily. Otherwise, I believe it is easier to pick good companies in a growing market and likely end up a winner in the long run. 

I have learned so much more about investing in US recently,  ETF - leveraged & inverse, options and gain reasonably good understanding of the usefulness of these products in risk management eg hedging using inverse ETF or options, there are in fact very good products if one understand and manage the risk accordingly. 

Options is something that I have been resisting in the past as many investors/fund collapsed due to this product. Though I had some basic knowledge about it from my Uni studies but that's far from adequate to give me the confidence to even learn more and explore this product. Well, I finally told myself to keep an open mind, learn and learn more about this product and why some investors lost big and how to avoid that, why this product is still available if it is all that bad, how Warren Buffet made good use of this product. It is in fact a very useful product - it provides avenue for monetisation of the equity holdings that we have and make some return for idle cash while waiting to fish at bottom. If we don't understand the purpose of option and just see it as stocks/products for trading purposes, then we could expose to unlimited loss when thing goes the other direction. 

I am glad that I keep an open mind and finally look at what option is all about,  I saw something I didn't or refused to find out in the past. Investing is not just about earning, it is learning too !! 

 

   

Will you be different this time?

There are many write-ups and articles on how stock market performed during and post war period, there was not even one time market did not recover because the market never "die", very likely the impact on stock market from this war will not be different and market will recover and continue its trajectory. I guess the more relevant question should be..how do we ensure we survive during the crisis and enjoy the gain brought by post crisis recovery. Yes, this time is no different for the market, it may still be volative and go down more, but it will recover once the crisis is contained/resolved/or can be on going for much longer with no expectation of major shock. So will you be different this time? 

Besides investing in financially sound and profitable companies, I now put into practice what I have learnt for so long but never have the gut to explore. I have decided to learn how to hedge my portfolio with inverse ETF [ CFD could be my next learning subject :)]. My main purpose is not to short the market or try to profit from the falling market, instead I would like to protect my portfolio value from falling too much and get emotionally affected, that may lead to unnecessary action (sell at depressed price) or inaction by ignoring what is happening (do nothing when crisis just started). 

Through my first 2 months (in 2022) experience of enduring volatile market with inverse ETF, it did provide the hedging expected and reduce my anxiety during the falling market as the fall in value of portfolio is mitigated during the fall, of course the gain is also partly offset by the hedging when market is up. The objective of hedging during crisis is to mitigate the fear of major losses, which may result in smaller gain should the market stage a strong rebound too fast. But it served the purpose, reduce the anxiety and stress during volatile and sharp fall market. For that, I am positive about the objectives of these financial products (inverse and leveraged ETFs) -  hedging and leveraging seems to work well to address my concern. 

I have now moved into the next learning subject, close the short position(inverse ETF) and build long position via long leveraged ETF into the portfolio in anticipation of market recovery as I believe in past statistics - bear market duration is usually shorter than bull market. yes, this will not be the last crisis and we will see many more crisis if we live long enough. 

If you are not happy with how you handled your investment in the past crisis, how would it be different to you this time or the future crisis when it happens? I believe in continuous improvement through continuous learning and in fact, I am excited this time :) .

The patient investor

 

It came to my knowledge that some close friends that I know have been making good money lately by joining social media investing group, even my sister who does not know much about stock investment asked me if I can help in trading stocks.

It makes me ponder on my belief in value investing, buying good companies when it is undervalued or buying great companies at reasonable price. Yes, I know, investment is about the future and the objective is the same  - to make money from investment. But the key difference is the risk involved when comparing investing (rather speculating)  based on pure speculation or hope and investing based on facts, figures and more reasonable forecast about future.

For instance, Bursa currently present some of these choices:-

1. Tech stocks with current valuation sky high, but with reasonably fair expectation of strong growth ahead. Now it is entering correction phase

2. Glove stocks with current valuation appears low, but with expectation super profit will revert to normal level soon

3. Hot penny stocks with lots of stories and many have made good money and continue to attract more people into it  

4. Plantation stocks with CPO keep climbing but not the stock price, on concern of ESG issue

5. Traditional stocks with reasonable valuation but not much growth expected, is getting attention lately

6. Stocks badly affected by pandemic and expected to recover soon as vaccination already started

7. Oil prices recovered strongly to near US$70 a barrel, market focus shift to Oil & Gas stocks  

There are always opportunities in the market, rotational play will set in when one sector seems overvalued and others undervalued. I am not sure if chasing momentum stocks is a better strategy in such market, I have to admit I am not good at it. I tend to believe what a very patient guru once said:" stock market is an exceptionally efficient mechanism for the transfer of wealth from the impatient to the patient". 

Well, his company Berkshire Hathaway uphold that belief now as the share price has been climbing lately. That shows an obvious shift of attention from growth to value stocks in the recent correction on high growth tech stocks. 

Price volatility is not risk, value destruction is.

 

2020 - Year of Awakening

Year 2020 will be a memorable year for all due to the covid pandemic, it has impacted almost every aspect of one's life and has changed perspective of many, whether in daily life, investment, career, family, etc. Whatever it is, continuous learning and adapting to changes are the most important lesson in life.

2008 financial crisis has taught me to only invest in fundamentally strong companies and ever since I have been avoiding highly geared companies and those weak in financial position and cash flow. I have also started to invest in REITS for recurring and stable dividend income as well as what is known as value stocks with strong free cashflow and reasonable (>4%) to high(>6%) dividend yields. I must say I had enjoyed a smooth sailing without much volatility and performed portfolio re-alignment once a while.  

Now year 2020 has changed what was thought to be rather resilient stocks. Few important lessons I learnt:-

• The pandemic has accelerated the change in business model and adoption of technology Eg retail & office REITS once thought to be stable are affected badly, even the weaker healthcare Reits such as First Reits is hit extremely bad. In addition, during the pandemic many Reits tried to built up their cash reserve by reducing dividend, some were even doing cash call/rights issue, not only I didnt get the dividend I used to receive, I need to utilise my reserve to avoid dilution :(
• My portfolio was heavy on value and income stock. Some value stocks that look cheap when I bought them, looks even cheaper. I am referring to Chinese banking stocks - looked cheap then with good dividend yield, now even cheaper. The hard truth is these stocks are perceived to be low growth stock. When times are bad, bank face high default risks, in addition, these state controlled stocks are vehicle used to support and save other businesses when times are bad. Hence, they do not have the total freedom and theirs' deep value become deeper. 
• The anti trust law and propaganda happening everywhere has resulted in disruption in growth of technology giants. More so in China where policy dictate whether a person or a company still has the future once perceived to be very bright. Alibaba/ANT serves as good reminder not to bet big in a single Chinese stock no matter how bright the future looks.     
• Reinforced my own preference all this while - avoiding airline stocks whether economy good or bad. I always think this industry is a very tough industry with fierce competition, highly impacted by fluctuation in oil price, highly geared.. yes, I may not understand well about this industry but I just do not have faith in them, May be I always thought of Malaysia Airline as an example.  

What have I changed in 2020:-

• accelerated my learning and adoption of ETFs - which I find suits me quite well, more diversification, less volatility and seems able to achieve reasonable growth in the long run
• reduce exposure to a specific country, hence reducing risk of a particular currency devaluation
• realignment between income, value and growth stocks to achieve a more balanced portfolio 

I am happy that there are some good picks in 2020 eg Eita, HLInd, Frencken and Tech, Income & Growth ETFs as a result of the realignment, of course partly due to luck as in the case of Eita for its bonus issue exercise.

No matter what crisis or events, it will still recover. Therefore, we just need to ensure we or the stocks we invested survive the shock, then everything will be fine.

Wishing all of us a safe and fulfilling 2021. 

Daibochi - a long term & sustainable growth stock?

 

Year 2020 is almost over, despite the deadly Covid 19 impact at the beginning of the year, stock market indexes have recovered and some even surpassed level before the pandemic eg. DJIA, Nasdaq and our FBM KLCI too. Surprisingly HSI, STI and ASX are still below the Jan 2020 level. 

A stock in my portfolio that has shown good return this year is Daibochi ( I know, nothing compared to glove stocks). Let's have a quick look at its FY20 annual report and see whether it has a long term & sustainable growth potential:-

1. FY2020 Revenue (FY 2019 consists of 19 months), Earnings and Dividend per share are all showing good growth

2. Company's growth strategies:-

- allocating Rm100 million in FY20 & FY21 to expand capacity by 60%

- developing sustainable FPP to meet customers need 

- expand beyond just MNC into regional brand customers in Southeast Asia & Oceania

3. Strong management if we believe the Scientex DNA is embedded

I am positive with these growth strategies and hence holding on to it as I believe it is still at the beginning of a long and sustainable growth trajectory. At current price of 2.70, it does not look over or undervalue but if the 60% capacity expansion is delivering the growth expected, I hope its value will be double by then.

As some of you may already know, there is a substantial shareholder, Samarang Asian Prosperity Fund started offloading Daibochi since July 2020. Based on its last announcement on 19 Oct 2020, it has reduced it stake to less than 5% (about 16 million shares) but I believe it is still selling. This, I believe has somewhat suppressed the share price of Daibochi lately. 

As long as it continues to deliver growth and when Samarang has stopped or finished selling, the price should continue its uptrend to demonstrate the characteristic of growth stock. Please do your own assessment if you decide to invest in Daibochi as I have vested interest in it.